| line |
stmt |
bran |
cond |
sub |
pod |
time |
code |
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package Math::Expression::Evaluator::Optimizer; |
|
2
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
40
|
use strict; |
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
3
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
39
|
use warnings; |
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
4658
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math::Expression::Evaluator::Optimizer - |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimize Math::Expression::Evaluator ASTs |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SYNOPSIS |
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use Math::Expression::Evaluator; |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my $m = Math::Expression::Evaluator->new("2 + 4*f"); |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m->optimize(); |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (0..100){ |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
print $m->val({f => $_}), "\n"; |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math::Expression::Evaluator::Optimizer performs simple optimizations on the |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract syntax tree from Math::Expression::Evaluator. |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should not use this module directly, but interface it via |
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following optimizations are implemented: |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=over |
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item * |
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant sub expressions: C is simplfied to |
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item * |
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joining of constants in mixed constant/variable expressions: C<2 + var + 3> |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is simplified to C. Works only with sums and products (but internally |
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a C<2 - 3 + x> is represented as C<2 + (-3) + x>, so it actually works with |
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
differences and divisions as well). |
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item * |
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flattening of nested sub expression: C is flattened into |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Currently this is done before any other optimization and not |
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repeated. |
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back |
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C currently takes two full loops through the AST, copying and |
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recreating it. If you execute C only once, calling C |
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is in fact a performance loss. |
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the expression is optimizable, and you execute it C<$n> times, you |
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
usually have a net gain over unoptimized execution if C<< $n > 15 >>. |
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course that value depends on the complexity of the expression, and how |
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well it can be reduced by the implemented optimizations. |
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your best is to always benchmark what you do. Most of the time the compiled |
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
version returned by C<< ->compiled >> is much faster than the optimized |
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(and not compiled) form. |
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=cut |
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my %is_commutative = ( |
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'+' => 1, |
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'*' => 1, |
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
); |
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sub _optimize { |
|
74
|
373
|
|
|
373
|
|
540
|
my ($expr, $ast) = @_; |
|
75
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
return _partial_execute($expr, _flatten($ast)); |
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Note: if you ever want to introduce some kind of scoping that is |
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# tied to blocks, remove the '{' here. |
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my %flattable = map { $_ => 1 } ('{', '+', '*'); |
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sub _flatten { |
|
83
|
890
|
|
|
890
|
|
1110
|
my ($ast) = @_; |
|
84
|
890
|
100
|
|
|
|
2533
|
return $ast unless ref $ast; |
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
my $type = shift @$ast; |
|
87
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
my @new_nodes = ($type); |
|
88
|
322
|
100
|
|
|
|
614
|
if ($flattable{$type}){ |
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# interpolate AST nodes with the same type |
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# e.g. ['+', 2, ['+', 3, 4]] into ['+', 2, 3, 4] |
|
91
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
for (map { _flatten($_) } @$ast){ |
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
92
|
291
|
100
|
100
|
|
|
966
|
if (ref $_ and $_->[0] eq $type){ |
|
93
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
my @inner_nodes = @$_; |
|
94
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
shift @inner_nodes; |
|
95
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
push @new_nodes, @inner_nodes; |
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
97
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
push @new_nodes, $_; |
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
101
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
push @new_nodes, map { _flatten($_) } @$ast; |
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
103
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
893
|
return \@new_nodes; |
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# _parital_execute reduces constant subexpressions to a minimal form. |
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sub _partial_execute { |
|
109
|
373
|
|
|
373
|
|
503
|
my ($expr, $ast) = @_; |
|
110
|
373
|
100
|
|
|
|
675
|
if (ref $ast){ |
|
111
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
394
|
my @nodes = @$ast; |
|
112
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
my $type = shift @nodes; |
|
113
|
178
|
100
|
100
|
|
|
756
|
if ($type eq '=' || $type eq '$'){ |
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# XXX what to do about assignments? more thoughts needed |
|
115
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
return $ast; |
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
117
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
my @new_nodes = ($type); |
|
118
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
my $tainted = 0; |
|
119
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
for my $n (@nodes){ |
|
120
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
push @new_nodes, _optimize($expr, $n); |
|
121
|
289
|
100
|
|
|
|
1009
|
if (ref $new_nodes[-1]){ |
|
122
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
$tainted = 1; |
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
125
|
144
|
100
|
|
|
|
291
|
if ($tainted){ |
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# try to optimize things like '2 + a +3' into 'a + 5' |
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# is only allowed for commutative ops |
|
128
|
29
|
100
|
|
|
|
74
|
if ($is_commutative{$type}){ |
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# print STDERR "Trying commutative optimization\n"; |
|
130
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
my @untainted = ($type); |
|
131
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
my @tainted = ($type); |
|
132
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
for (1..$#new_nodes) { |
|
133
|
80
|
100
|
|
|
|
141
|
if (ref $new_nodes[$_]){ |
|
134
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
push @tainted, $new_nodes[$_]; |
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
136
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
push @untainted, $new_nodes[$_]; |
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
27
|
100
|
|
|
|
65
|
if (@untainted > 2) { |
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# there is something to optimize |
|
142
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
push @tainted, $expr->_execute(\@untainted); |
|
143
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
return \@tainted; |
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# 'twas all in vain |
|
146
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
return \@new_nodes; |
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
149
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
return \@new_nodes; |
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
152
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
return $expr->_execute(\@new_nodes); |
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} else { |
|
155
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
return $ast; |
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} |
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1; |
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# vim: sw=4 ts=4 expandtab |